Opposing War Is Not the Same as Making Peace
Social Justice — By Neva Reece on February 12, 2010 at 12:00 amMost of our attention is focused on Haiti these days – with good reason – but life goes on in other parts of the world with striking consistency. 
Soon after listening to the President’s speech on Afghanistan this December, and even before, I found messages in my email from organizations objecting to his decision to send more troops into Afghanistan. I, too, am deeply saddened by this turn of events. I, too, had hoped that somehow our new President would find a way out of the fighting and bring our troops home from both Iraq and Afghanistan. However, I have come to the conclusion that objecting to war is not the same thing as building for peace. I consider myself a pacifist, but I do not feel called to object to the war or even to the increased deployment of troops. I have a vision of a more nuanced and perhaps more difficult approach. I am still opposed to war, and I am deeply grieved for those who will go or return to the arena of war. With all that in mind, I have come to the belief that as a pacifist, my job is to build for peace, to consistently prepare in a steady and methodical way for peace, and to lay the groundwork and foundation at every turn.
As an individual, I can be non-violent, but as a member of society and a citizen of a country, I believe that my job as a pacifist is different. Over the last forty years, I have known many friends who preferred to distance themselves from any identification with America in times of war. I can understand the sentiment, but I have come to value a different approach. I believe that as true pacifists, we have a more difficult, challenging and productive role to play. To attempt to alienate oneself is the game and illusion of the individualist; peace is a participatory process. It is not simply the absence of war and is certainly not the absence of conflict. Peace is found within our essential response to conflict. As pacifists, we cannot force others into our point of view or understanding of the world. Our job is more difficult. We must work to humanize the view of our enemies, increase the understanding of the politics and policies involved, prepare the way for more opportunities for peaceful resolutions in the future and to never give in to discouragement or cynicism. And perhaps more importantly, we must give up our self-centered desire to believe that we as individuals or even our generation is somehow entitled to be the one to see an end to war. Millions of people across the world must be prepared for peace, understand the processes of peace, and be willing to interact accordingly for that to happen. All we can do, and the very best we can do, is to fulfill our role, carry our small bucket to the flames and trust that though we may not see the benefits, we have done our part. Even when we act without intent, we build what we cannot see, we trod paths to a future we will not know. Instead can we build with intent, making the way for more opportunities in the future for peaceful solutions to increasingly complex problems?
Though the work is universal, we must understand, know, and reflect that the work of the pacifist is a continual act of patriotism. One small act for peace is to claim the label of patriot for those who diligently work for peace alongside those who, with great integrity and character, believe that war is necessary. Instead of blocking their way, can we help them find a new foothold toward peaceful resolutions in difficult times? I am cognizant that it is easier for me to take this approach because we have a President in whom I have confidence. It would be much more difficult if I viewed his decision as one made without regard for the realities of the situation. But because of the character of this President, it is easier for me to believe that productive work towards peace by American citizens will not be in vain. I believe he is someone who will take advantage of any foothold we can help provide to move in that new direction and bring us closer to a world that knows how to engage in finding solutions without armed conflict.
At this point, I have no desire to hear about signing petitions, taking to the streets or other like activities on the issue of war. I have done them all before, now I am ready to try a new approach, ready to find ways to make peace.



7 Comments
Me too! Very good article. Very well said. Thank you for articulating such an intelligent and pragmatic view.
Obama is an ego-maniac and a liar.
I appreciate your observations, and honor your choice, and even agree with some of your basic tenants. I think I would have been more comfortable if you had included in the dialog you have with others, the hard task of explaining “justice”. I mean, sometimes “justice” is as important an issue as peace. I think this point is all to often missed is found in two failed concepts. 1) That evil went away when Hitler died, and that 2) man is basically good, and if you just reason with them you can work it out. But people dedicated to your distruction could care less about your family, kids, friends or “form” of government. Scripture says that “man is basically evil” not “basically good”, so you can expect that on any given day, both on a national level and personal one, that someone is going to try to “impose” their will on you, and usually thru force, and they don’t really care about all the good ideas you have for getting along. Several past wars have taught us many painful lessons, and the expense of many lost lives of sons, daughters, husbands and wives.
I was reminded of a 60′s song by Al Wilson called “The Snake Song”. You can see the listen and see the lyrics on Youtube, kind of interesting.
Although I fundamentally agree with you I cannot help but wonder what history has to say about all of this. The Prime Minister of the UK in the era leading up to World War Two made a compromise thinking that appeasing Germany’s imperialistic impulse would curb an all out war. In order to pursue this method of diplomacy he gave the Nazi’s the British seal of approval to invade Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic). The rest is a grim and bloody history obviously.
It seems like any sort of humanitarian sentiment would find it’s conclusion in Allied military action in WWII, in order to save Europe and the rest of the world, we have to fight against Germany. Individual pacifism may make a mugger feel awkward about taking your money at the moment….but it’s also likely that the next person he comes across will receive the “shoot now; ask questions later” treatment. How do you feel about that? What would an 87 year old Czech man have to say regarding American pacifism and its’ impact on his life?
I’m curious what you mean that pacifists should “work to humanize the view of our enemies”?
Why do I get the feeling that Neve does not want to dialog about this?
I am so sorry I did not reply to any of you. I had submitted this piece, but somehow did not realize it had gotten published. I was just experimenting with the DuckDuckGo search engine and happened to run into this post. Will be coming back to read comments more carefully later and respond.